Assessment of angle closure disease in the age of artificial intelligence: A review.

Primary angle closure glaucoma is a visually debilitating disease that is under-detected worldwide. Many of the challenges in managing primary angle closure disease (PACD) are related to the lack of convenient and precise tools for clinic-based disease assessment and monitoring. Artificial intelligence (AI)- assisted tools to detect and assess PACD have proliferated in recent years with encouraging results. Machine learning (ML) algorithms that utilize clinical data have been developed to categorize angle closure eyes by disease mechanism. Other ML algorithms that utilize image data have demonstrated good performance in detecting angle closure. Nonetheless, deep learning (DL) algorithms trained directly on image data generally outperformed traditional ML algorithms in detecting PACD, were able to accurately differentiate between angle status (open, narrow, closed), and automated the measurement of quantitative parameters. However, more work is required to expand the capabilities of these AI algorithms and for deployment into real-world practice settings. This includes the need for real-world evaluation, establishing the use case for different algorithms, and evaluating the feasibility of deployment while considering other clinical, economic, social, and policy-related factors.

Surgical Outcomes of Transposition Surgery for the Correction of Large-Angle Strabismus.

BACKGROUND: Many potential surgical options exist to address large-angle deviations and head turns that result from various forms of paralytic strabismus. Muscle transposition surgeries serve as suitable alternatives to simple resection-recessions. Here, we report outcomes of augmented Hummelsheim and X-type transpositions for the correction of large-angle strabismus and provide insights for surgical planning. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 40 consecutive patients with strabismus who were treated with an augmented Hummelsheim or X-type transposition surgery at a single academic medical center. Etiologies included cranial nerve palsies (n = 26), monocular elevation palsy (n = 3), Duane syndrome (n = 1), traumatic extraocular muscle damage (n = 8), and chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (n = 2). All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 months postsurgery. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess for predictors of surgical outcome. RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in our series. The median preoperative deviation was 46.5Δ (interquartile range [IQR] 35-70). The median postoperative deviation 2 months after surgery was 0.5Δ (IQR 0-9.5), which represented a significant improvement (P < 0.001). Thirty-three patients (82.5%) experienced an improvement in range and/or centration of binocular single vision (BSV). More patients who underwent an augmented Hummelsheim procedure and had a small overcorrection at postoperative day 3 had a favorable result on postoperative month 2 (79%) compared with those that were initially under-corrected (38%). Multiple logistic regressions found larger preoperative deviation (P < 0.005) and esotropia (P < 0.021) to be predictors of a less favorable surgical outcome (C-statistic = 0.83). Subgroup analysis revealed that less, favorable outcome after X-type transposition occurred most frequently in patients undergoing correction of an esodeviation. CONCLUSION: Augmented Hummelsheim transposition techniques offer effective treatment options for paralytic strabismus with esotropic deviations, whereas X-type transpositions are effective for exotropic deviations and deviations from severe inferior rectus damage. In addition to potentially providing a wider field of BSV, improved centration is often achieved.